![]() ![]() The most important parts of Fiddler's statistics panel, first Firefox then Chrome:īytes Received: 386 579 (headers:18 291 body:368 288)Īpplication/-stream-compressible: 197 757īytes Received: 2 271 948 (headers:87 243 body:2 184 705)Īpplication/-stream-compressible: 545 110 the most noteworthy observation is that Chrome (real Chrome, not just spoofing UA) loads a lot more data than Firefox. You can install to achieve this more conveniently. ![]() The performance is significantly better, along with some broken parts of google maps now work. To demonstrate how Google are perverting the performance of google maps in Firefox In Firefox v43.0.4, change the user agent string to "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3 Trident/7.0 rv:11.0) like Gecko" then browse / use google maps. > asap, google will engineer Mozilla out of existence. > very badly in Mozilla's java-script engine. > Google have been very clever in ensuring they use functions that perform > Google want Firefox dead, and this is just another weapon to push people off > functions where Firefox performs very poorly but where chrome performs well. > The performance is due to very carefully selected and somewhat clever use of ![]() (In reply to John Burges from comment #8) I realise it might be not a simple matter to sort out, it probably will require some major change in the coding but if you want to stay in the market it has to be done. įirefox excell in customization it is brilliant BUT PERFORMANCE is as the numbers show the most important factor so please FORWARD THIS "bug" to the right people. I do care about Firefox and if you don't want to loose comunity as at the moment the numbers are falling in favor to Chrome, have a look yourself (all other browsers are loosing too but it is not the point) you have lost nearly 5% in last year. HP ZR30W 2560x1600 resolution (on other machines resolution was much lower and it made no difference it was still super slow, besides Chrome and IE are fine in this resolution) My computer specs are very and this problem were replicated on 5 different computers with different systems Windows XP 32bit, Win 7 32 and 64 bit. I have posted many times on many forums about this problem and it seems that nobody who deals with Firefox problems cares enough about it. I admit it is a tiny bit slower in chrome but in Firefox it just don't work at all. AND if you switch to new version of maps which they are testing at the moment it totally is unusable in FF. So if you need confirmation of this bug just install yourself newest versions of Chrome, IE and Firefox and then go straight to .uk.Ĭomparing Chrome and Firefox is like night and day. It is very well known fact around the net. I can't stress enough how poor firefox's performance in regard to google maps is in comparison to Chrome and IE. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |